H2H data updated: 2026-10-24 00:00 UTC

Catherine Tanvier vs Annabel Croft H2H: 1-1

Catherine Tanvier and Annabel Croft are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on carpet, while Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1985 Eastbourne Open round of 64 7-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Annabel Croft
GBR Age 60

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Annabel Croft 7-6 7-5 Catherine Tanvier #28 Match data Jun 19, 1985* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Catherine Tanvier 6-2 6-2 Annabel Croft Match data Oct 20, 1983* R32 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,879 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Catherine Tanvier Annabel Croft
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0
15 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0 1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0
16 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0
17 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,801 0 0 1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0
18 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,827 0 0 1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,762 0 1
19 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,778 0 0 1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1
20 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0 1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,575 0 1
21 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,826 0 0 1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1
22 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,619 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,674 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,657 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,614 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Catherine Tanvier Annabel Croft
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
15 1980 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1982 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
16 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
18 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6% 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7%
19 1984 5 5 10 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
20 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1988 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 40 45 85 47.1% 51 52 103 49.5% 28 32 60 46.7% 41 46 87 47.1% — 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Catherine Tanvier Annabel Croft
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.80
15 1980 1546 111.1 — — — — — +25 — 57.1% +0.79 2–0 0–1 — +0.78 1982 1589 120.2 — — — — — +11 -33 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +1.92
16 1981 1541 110.4 — — — — +70 +73 +7 34.9% -1.14 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — -0.05 1983 1595 118.2 — — — — -28 — +2 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.83
17 1982 1801 146.0 — — — — -101 -57 -142 54.0% +0.40 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 106.1 -4.01 1984 1616 118.3 — — — — -4 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.31
18 1983 1827 138.9 — — — — +19 -51 -192 52.0% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -1.11 1985 1762 133.3 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.81
19 1984 1779 138.5 — — — — +11 +66 -120 52.4% +0.25 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 101.9 -0.73 1986 1654 120.7 — — — — +69 -92 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.28
20 1985 1776 132.0 — — — — -9 +34 -112 54.3% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.4 -0.50 1987 1575 108.3 — — — — +47 — -107 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.95
21 1986 1826 142.1 — — — — +18 -76 -150 47.6% -0.15 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 108.6 -1.62 1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72
22 1987 1620 113.3 — — — — +55 +14 +54 38.8% -0.72 5–6 (45%) 1–7 (13%) 92.3 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 1604 122.5 — — — — +8 +16 +40 40.7% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 1674 141.1 — — — — -10 -62 +28 50.9% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 1658 111.6 — — — — -1 -82 +74 45.0% -0.43 2–0 1–1 — +0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 1604 113.4 — — — — +31 -74 — 40.5% -0.43 4–1 (80%) 0–3 (0%) 101.2 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 1614 106.2 — — — — +44 — — 42.9% -0.57 2–0 — — +1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1579 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1880 137.1 — — — — +7 -13 -54 47.4% -0.16 49–31 (61%) 23–32 (42%) 105.2 -1.87 — 1781 125.3 — — — — +49 -69 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.64

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.