H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catherine Tanvier vs Annabel Croft H2H: 1-1
Catherine Tanvier and Annabel Croft are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on carpet, while Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1985 Eastbourne second round 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1985* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Annabel Croft | 7-6 7-5 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
| Oct 20, 1983* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Catherine Tanvier | 6-2 6-2 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catherine Tanvier | Annabel Croft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |