H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Catherine Tanvier vs Carling Bassett Seguso H2H: 0-2
Carling Bassett Seguso holds a 2–0 lead over Catherine Tanvier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carling Bassett Seguso leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carling Bassett Seguso won the 1986 Roland Garros first round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 58
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Carling Bassett Seguso | 7-5 6-3 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
| Dec 14, 1984* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Carling Bassett Seguso | 7-5 6-3 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carling Bassett Seguso | — | — | — | 2,009 | 149 | 101 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catherine Tanvier | Carling Bassett Seguso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 37–20 | 64.9% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 18–12 | 60.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,768 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |