H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Catherine Tanvier vs Caroline Kuhlman H2H: 1-0

Catherine Tanvier holds a 1–0 lead over Caroline Kuhlman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1986 Wimbledon round of 128 2-6 6-4 8-6.

FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catherine Tanvier #58 2-6 6-4 8-6 Caroline Kuhlman #73 Match data Jun 25, 1986* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,879 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Caroline Kuhlman #745 #52 22 1,660 49 65 43.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Catherine Tanvier Caroline Kuhlman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 4–2 66.7% 1,545 0 0
16 1981 6–14 30.0% 1,540 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% 1,492 0 0
17 1982 23–19 54.8% 1,800 0 0
18 1983 17–16 51.5% 1,826 0 0 1985 9–4 69.2% #68 1,614 0 0
19 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0 1986 6–9 40.0% #92 1,620 0 0
20 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0
21 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,826 0 0
22 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0
23 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,603 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #291 1,628 0 0
24 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0 1991 2–7 22.2% #190 1,563 0 0
25 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,657 0 0 1992 7–9 43.8% #100 1,624 0 0
26 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0 1993 16–17 48.5% #78 1,617 0 0
27 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,613 0 0 1994 8–16 33.3% #93 1,574 0 0
28 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #745 1,566 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Catherine Tanvier Caroline Kuhlman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4%
18 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6% 1985 5 3 8 62.5%
19 1984 5 5 10 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7%
22 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1991 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1993 11 10 21 52.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1994 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 40 45 85 47.1% 51 52 103 49.5% 28 32 60 46.7% 41 46 87 47.1% 31 35 66 47.0% 8 16 24 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Catherine Tanvier Caroline Kuhlman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1546 111.1 +25 57.1% +0.79 2–0 0–1 +0.83
16 1981 1540 110.2 +71 +74 +8 34.9% -1.14 2–3 (40%) 1–1 +0.01 1983 1492 98.7 0.0% -4.00 0.00
17 1982 1801 145.8 -102 -58 -144 54.0% +0.40 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 106.1 -4.11
18 1983 1826 138.7 +20 -51 -192 52.0% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -0.26 1985 1614 127.5 +22 61.3% +1.13 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 106.2 +0.67
19 1984 1778 138.4 +11 +67 -119 52.4% +0.25 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 101.9 -0.85 1986 1620 116.2 +40 42.4% -0.64 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.4 +0.90
20 1985 1775 131.9 -9 +35 -111 54.3% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.4 -0.41
21 1986 1826 142.0 +17 -76 -150 47.6% -0.15 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 108.6 -1.68
22 1987 1619 112.9 +55 +15 +55 38.8% -0.72 5–6 (45%) 1–7 (13%) 92.3 -0.42
23 1988 1604 122.4 +7 +16 +40 40.7% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 0–1 -1.01 1990 1628 103.3 50.0% -0.75 -0.03
24 1989 1674 141.0 -11 -62 +28 50.9% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–0 -0.68 1991 1564 98.9 +2 -51 25.0% -1.40 1–1 1–0 +0.15
25 1990 1657 111.6 0 -81 +75 45.0% -0.43 2–0 1–1 +0.74 1992 1624 119.9 -19 -70 41.7% -0.69 3–1 (75%) 0–2 -0.32
26 1991 1603 113.4 +31 -73 40.5% -0.43 4–1 (80%) 0–3 (0%) 101.2 +0.59 1993 1618 115.4 +23 -66 50.7% -0.20 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 +2.53
27 1992 1614 106.1 +44 42.9% -0.57 2–0 +1.48 1994 1575 119.7 +31 -59 -15 38.2% -0.87 4–5 (44%) 0–1 +0.37
28 1993 1578 93.6 0.0% -3.50 0–1 +0.11 1995 1566 100.0 0.0% -4.00 -0.09
Career 1879 137.0 +7 -13 -54 47.4% -0.16 49–31 (61%) 23–32 (42%) 105.2 -1.67 1660 121.5 +20 -63 -15 44.2% -0.47 16–16 (50%) 11–10 (52%) 104.5 +3.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.