H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Catherine Tanvier vs Jo Anne Faull H2H: 0-1
Jo Anne Faull holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Tanvier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jo Anne Faull leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jo Anne Faull won the 1989 Rome second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 1989* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jo Anne Faull | 6-2 6-2 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jo Anne Faull | — | — | — | 1,718 | 32 | 62 | 34.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catherine Tanvier | Jo Anne Faull | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| -1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–16 | 20.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |