H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Catherine Tanvier vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-1

Catherine Tanvier and Kate Latham are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on carpet, while Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1983 Amelia Island round of 64 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catherine Tanvier 6-4 6-0 Kate Latham Match data Apr 13, 1983* R64 Amelia Island WTA 250 Clay
Kate Latham 1-6 7-6 6-2 Catherine Tanvier Match data Mar 12, 1982* R16 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,879 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Catherine Tanvier Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,800 0 0 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,826 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,826 0 0 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,603 0 0 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,657 0 0 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,613 0 0 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Catherine Tanvier Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 5 5 10 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1991 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 40 45 85 47.1% 51 52 103 49.5% 28 32 60 46.7% 41 46 87 47.1% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Catherine Tanvier Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1546 111.1 — — — — — +25 — 57.1% +0.79 2–0 0–1 — +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1540 110.2 — — — — +71 +74 +8 34.9% -1.14 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.01 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1982 1801 145.8 — — — — -102 -58 -144 54.0% +0.40 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 106.1 -4.11 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1983 1826 138.7 — — — — +20 -51 -192 52.0% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1778 138.4 — — — — +11 +67 -119 52.4% +0.25 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 101.9 -0.85 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 1985 1775 131.9 — — — — -9 +35 -111 54.3% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.4 -0.41 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1986 1826 142.0 — — — — +17 -76 -150 47.6% -0.15 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 108.6 -1.68 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 1987 1619 112.9 — — — — +55 +15 +55 38.8% -0.72 5–6 (45%) 1–7 (13%) 92.3 -0.42 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1988 1604 122.4 — — — — +7 +16 +40 40.7% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — -1.01 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 1989 1674 141.0 — — — — -11 -62 +28 50.9% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.68 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 1990 1657 111.6 — — — — 0 -81 +75 45.0% -0.43 2–0 1–1 — +0.74 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 1991 1603 113.4 — — — — +31 -73 — 40.5% -0.43 4–1 (80%) 0–3 (0%) 101.2 +0.59 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 1992 1614 106.1 — — — — +44 — — 42.9% -0.57 2–0 — — +1.48 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 1993 1578 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.11 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 1879 137.0 — — — — +7 -13 -54 47.4% -0.16 49–31 (61%) 23–32 (42%) 105.2 -1.67 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.