H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Catherine Tanvier vs Kim Jones H2H: 0-1

Kim Jones holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Tanvier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Jones leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kim Jones won the 1985 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kim Jones
USA Age 68

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Jones 6-2 6-4 Catherine Tanvier #47 Match data Oct 17, 1985* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,879 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kim Jones — — — 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Catherine Tanvier Kim Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,800 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,826 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
21 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,826 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
22 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,422 0 0
23 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,603 0 0 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,458 0 0
24 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0
25 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,657 0 0 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,757 0 1
26 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1
27 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,613 0 0 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,724 0 1
28 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Catherine Tanvier Kim Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 5 5 10 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
25 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 1991 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
Career — 40 45 85 47.1% 51 52 103 49.5% 28 32 60 46.7% 41 46 87 47.1% — 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Catherine Tanvier Kim Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1546 111.1 — — — — — +25 — 57.1% +0.79 2–0 0–1 — +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1540 110.2 — — — — +71 +74 +8 34.9% -1.14 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1801 145.8 — — — — -102 -58 -144 54.0% +0.40 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 106.1 -4.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1826 138.7 — — — — +20 -51 -192 52.0% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1778 138.4 — — — — +11 +67 -119 52.4% +0.25 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 101.9 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 1775 131.9 — — — — -9 +35 -111 54.3% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.4 -0.41 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08
21 1986 1826 142.0 — — — — +17 -76 -150 47.6% -0.15 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 108.6 -1.68 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09
22 1987 1619 112.9 — — — — +55 +15 +55 38.8% -0.72 5–6 (45%) 1–7 (13%) 92.3 -0.42 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +36 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50
23 1988 1604 122.4 — — — — +7 +16 +40 40.7% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — -1.01 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.50
24 1989 1674 141.0 — — — — -11 -62 +28 50.9% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.68 1982 1484 103.7 — — — — -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59
25 1990 1657 111.6 — — — — 0 -81 +75 45.0% -0.43 2–0 1–1 — +0.74 1983 1758 131.9 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43
26 1991 1603 113.4 — — — — +31 -73 — 40.5% -0.43 4–1 (80%) 0–3 (0%) 101.2 +0.59 1984 1667 132.6 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22
27 1992 1614 106.1 — — — — +44 — — 42.9% -0.57 2–0 — — +1.48 1985 1725 135.5 — — — — -10 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52
28 1993 1578 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.11 1986 1677 104.5 — — — — -12 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.70
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1629 103.9 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.24
Career — 1879 137.0 — — — — +7 -13 -54 47.4% -0.16 49–31 (61%) 23–32 (42%) 105.2 -1.67 — 1801 126.3 — — — — -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.