H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Catherine Tanvier vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 2-1

Catherine Tanvier holds a 2–1 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on carpet, while Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1990 Hamburg second round 6-0 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Larisa Savchenko
URS 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 2, 1990* Hamburg WTA 250 R64 Clay Catherine Tanvier #98 6-0 2-6 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #32 Match data
Jan 17, 1990* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Catherine Tanvier #83 4-6 6-1 12-10 Larisa Savchenko #21 Match data
Oct 23, 1987* Brighton WTA 250 R32 Carpet Larisa Savchenko #24 6-3 3-6 6-2 Catherine Tanvier #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,877 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 238 239 49.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Catherine Tanvier Larisa Savchenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0
1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,507 0 0
1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,791 0 0 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,683 0 0
1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,824 0 0 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,755 0 0
1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,792 0 0
1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0 1988 26–16 61.9% #16 1,861 0 0
1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,825 0 0 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,887 0 0
1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,715 0 0
1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,602 0 0 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,702 0 1
1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0 1992 18–18 50.0% #58 1,728 0 1
1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,658 0 0 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,755 0 2
1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2
1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,614 0 0 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,651 0 2
1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,669 0 2
— — — — — — — 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,622 0 2
— — — — — — — 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,654 0 2
— — — — — — — 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,586 0 2