H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Catherine Tanvier vs Laura Garrone H2H: 1-1

Catherine Tanvier and Laura Garrone are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on carpet, while Laura Garrone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1992 Cesena round of 16 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Laura Garrone
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catherine Tanvier #176 6-2 6-3 Laura Garrone #105 Match data Feb 21, 1992* R16 Cesena Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Laura Garrone #73 7-6(6) 6-3 Catherine Tanvier #100 Match data Aug 31, 1988* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,879 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laura Garrone #262 #32 90 1,726 109 130 45.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Catherine Tanvier Laura Garrone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #234 1,491 0 0
17 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,800 0 0 1985 5–5 50.0% #203 1,530 0 0
18 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,826 0 0 1986 22–14 61.1% #38 1,678 0 0
19 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0 1987 15–17 46.9% #86 1,611 0 0
20 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0 1988 17–17 50.0% #64 1,637 0 0
21 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,826 0 0 1989 14–17 45.2% #87 1,607 0 0
22 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0 1990 14–15 48.3% #65 1,609 0 0
23 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,603 0 0 1991 10–14 41.7% #93 1,622 0 0
24 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0 1992 5–12 29.4% #156 1,559 0 0
25 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,657 0 0 1993 0–3 0.0% #169 1,521 0 0
26 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #167 1,519 0 0
27 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,613 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #194 1,492 0 0
28 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0 1996 1–3 25.0% #258 1,467 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1997 2–2 50.0% #224 1,501 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Catherine Tanvier Laura Garrone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 20 9 29 69.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1984 5 5 10 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1987 3 7 10 30.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 1990 2 2 4 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 — — — — 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1991 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1994 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
27 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 40 45 85 47.1% 51 52 103 49.5% 28 32 60 46.7% 41 46 87 47.1% — 12 22 34 35.3% 88 90 178 49.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 11 15 26.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Catherine Tanvier Laura Garrone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1546 111.1 — — — — — +25 — 57.1% +0.79 2–0 0–1 — +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1540 110.2 — — — — +71 +74 +8 34.9% -1.14 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.01 1984 1491 101.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04
17 1982 1801 145.8 — — — — -102 -58 -144 54.0% +0.40 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 106.1 -4.11 1985 1530 112.1 — — — — +27 +58 — 50.0% +0.09 1–1 — — +1.29
18 1983 1826 138.7 — — — — +20 -51 -192 52.0% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -0.26 1986 1679 134.8 — — — — -125 +127 — 60.2% +0.82 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.8 +2.90
19 1984 1778 138.4 — — — — +11 +67 -119 52.4% +0.25 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 101.9 -0.85 1987 1612 116.6 — — — — -75 +112 -43 46.7% -0.13 6–7 (46%) 0–3 (0%) 95.4 +4.27
20 1985 1775 131.9 — — — — -9 +35 -111 54.3% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.4 -0.41 1988 1638 122.2 — — — — -120 +69 — 49.4% -0.04 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 +1.56
21 1986 1826 142.0 — — — — +17 -76 -150 47.6% -0.15 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 108.6 -1.68 1989 1608 123.3 — — — — -78 +56 — 44.1% -0.31 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +2.18
22 1987 1619 112.9 — — — — +55 +15 +55 38.8% -0.72 5–6 (45%) 1–7 (13%) 92.3 -0.42 1990 1609 114.2 — — — — -61 +31 — 47.8% +0.03 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 +1.49
23 1988 1604 122.4 — — — — +7 +16 +40 40.7% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — -1.01 1991 1623 119.5 — — — — -83 -31 +17 42.6% -0.87 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.5 -0.55
24 1989 1674 141.0 — — — — -11 -62 +28 50.9% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.68 1992 1559 114.1 — — — — -34 +20 — 32.4% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.6 -0.10
25 1990 1657 111.6 — — — — 0 -81 +75 45.0% -0.43 2–0 1–1 — +0.74 1993 1522 103.3 — — — — — +11 — 25.0% -1.37 0–2 — — -0.08
26 1991 1603 113.4 — — — — +31 -73 — 40.5% -0.43 4–1 (80%) 0–3 (0%) 101.2 +0.59 1994 1520 113.3 — — — — — +23 — 37.5% -0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.17
27 1992 1614 106.1 — — — — +44 — — 42.9% -0.57 2–0 — — +1.48 1995 1492 97.8 — — — — — +14 — 31.3% -1.50 1–1 — — +0.33
28 1993 1578 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.11 1996 1468 98.9 — — — — — +5 — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 0–1 — +0.48
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1501 112.4 — — — — — +13 — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.18
Career — 1879 137.0 — — — — +7 -13 -54 47.4% -0.16 49–31 (61%) 23–32 (42%) 105.2 -1.67 — 1726 125.1 — — — — -79 +56 -17 46.4% -0.19 36–45 (44%) 18–21 (46%) 97.2 +5.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.