H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Catherine Tanvier vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 1-0
Catherine Tanvier holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Golarsa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1992 Cesena semifinal 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1992* | Cesena | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Catherine Tanvier | 6-2 6-1 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Golarsa | #693 | #39 | 436 | 1,761 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catherine Tanvier | Laura Golarsa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #79 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #58 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #61 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #213 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #168 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 |