H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC
Catherine Tanvier holds a 1–0 lead over Linley Tanner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1986 Tokyo Pan Pacific round of 32 6-7 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Tanvier | 6-7 7-6 6-2 | Linley Tanner | Match data | Sep 11, 1986* | R32 | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,879 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Linley Tanner | — | — | — | 1,500 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catherine Tanvier | Linley Tanner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Catherine Tanvier | Linley Tanner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1980 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1986 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1981 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 40 | 45 | 85 | 47.1% | 51 | 52 | 103 | 49.5% | 28 | 32 | 60 | 46.7% | 41 | 46 | 87 | 47.1% | Career | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Catherine Tanvier | Linley Tanner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1980 | 1546 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | 57.1% | +0.79 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.83 | 1986 | 1494 | 103.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.03 |
| 1981 | 1540 | 110.2 | — | — | — | — | +71 | +74 | +8 | 34.9% | -1.14 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–1 | — | +0.01 | 1990 | 1483 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.08 |
| 1982 | 1801 | 145.8 | — | — | — | — | -102 | -58 | -144 | 54.0% | +0.40 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 106.1 | -4.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 1826 | 138.7 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -51 | -192 | 52.0% | -0.11 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–2 (67%) | 104.3 | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 1778 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | +11 | +67 | -119 | 52.4% | +0.25 | 6–2 (75%) | 4–6 (40%) | 101.9 | -0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1775 | 131.9 | — | — | — | — | -9 | +35 | -111 | 54.3% | +0.26 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 98.4 | -0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 1826 | 142.0 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -76 | -150 | 47.6% | -0.15 | 9–1 (90%) | 4–3 (57%) | 108.6 | -1.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1619 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | +55 | +15 | +55 | 38.8% | -0.72 | 5–6 (45%) | 1–7 (13%) | 92.3 | -0.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1604 | 122.4 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +16 | +40 | 40.7% | -0.54 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -1.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1674 | 141.0 | — | — | — | — | -11 | -62 | +28 | 50.9% | +0.16 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–0 | — | -0.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1657 | 111.6 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -81 | +75 | 45.0% | -0.43 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1603 | 113.4 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -73 | — | 40.5% | -0.43 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–3 (0%) | 101.2 | +0.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1614 | 106.1 | — | — | — | — | +44 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.57 | 2–0 | — | — | +1.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1578 | 93.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1879 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -13 | -54 | 47.4% | -0.16 | 49–31 (61%) | 23–32 (42%) | 105.2 | -1.67 | Career | 1500 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +2.50 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | 5 | 6 | 11 | Mar 4, 1988 | H2H |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 2 | 7 | 9 | Feb 14, 1992 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 3 | 5 | 8 | Jan 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 13, 1989 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 7 | 7 | May 27, 1987 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nana Smith | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 26, 1990 | H2H |
| Catherine Tanvier | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 11, 1986 | H2H |