H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Catherine Tanvier vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 2-1

Catherine Tanvier holds a 2–1 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1988 Oklahoma third round 1-6 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 25, 1988* Oklahoma WTA 250 R32 Hard Lori Mcneil #11 1-6 6-4 6-1 Catherine Tanvier #104 Match data
Oct 31, 1985* Zurich WTA 250 R32 Hard Catherine Tanvier #52 6-3 6-2 Lori Mcneil #89 Match data
May 31, 1984* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Catherine Tanvier #22 6-4 6-2 Lori Mcneil #111 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,877 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Catherine Tanvier Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,791 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,824 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,825 0 0 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,602 0 0 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,658 0 0 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,614 0 0 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11