H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Catherine Tanvier vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 1-2

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 2–1 lead over Catherine Tanvier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 2–0 on grass, while Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1990 Eastbourne second round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 1990* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #9 6-4 6-1 Catherine Tanvier #96 Match data
Jul 2, 1989* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #16 4-6 6-2 6-4 Catherine Tanvier #83 Match data
Jan 22, 1989* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Catherine Tanvier #61 6-2 6-3 Mary Joe Fernandez #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,877 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Catherine Tanvier Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,791 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,824 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,825 0 0 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,602 0 0 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,658 0 0 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,614 0 0 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7