H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Catherine Tanvier vs Petra Huber H2H: 3-1
Catherine Tanvier holds a 3–1 lead over Petra Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Catherine Tanvier leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Petra Huber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Huber won the 1988 Nice third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1988* | Nice | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Petra Huber | 6-0 6-1 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1987* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Catherine Tanvier | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | Petra Huber | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1987* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Catherine Tanvier | 6-7 6-3 6-4 | Petra Huber | Match data |
| Jan 30, 1985* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Catherine Tanvier | 7-5 6-3 | Petra Huber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Petra Huber | #458 | #37 | 13 | 1,737 | 58 | 79 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catherine Tanvier | Petra Huber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #53 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,626 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #84 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #178 | 1,520 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |