H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Catherine Tanvier vs Petra Huber H2H: 3-1

Catherine Tanvier holds a 3–1 lead over Petra Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Catherine Tanvier leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Petra Huber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Huber won the 1988 Nice round of 32 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Petra Huber
AUT Age 60

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Huber #118 6-0 6-1 Catherine Tanvier #93 Match data Jul 14, 1988* R32 Nice WTA 250 Clay
Catherine Tanvier #38 6-4 5-7 6-3 Petra Huber #66 Match data Feb 24, 1987* R128 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard
Catherine Tanvier #38 6-7 6-3 6-4 Petra Huber #66 Match data Feb 18, 1987* R64 Boca Raton WTA 250 Hard
Catherine Tanvier #31 7-5 6-3 Petra Huber Match data Jan 30, 1985* R64 Marco Island WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,879 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Petra Huber #458 #37 13 1,737 58 79 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Catherine Tanvier Petra Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0 1982 4–2 66.7% — 1,563 0 1
17 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,800 0 0 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,596 0 1
18 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,826 0 0 1984 12–14 46.2% #48 1,652 0 1
19 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0 1985 10–15 40.0% #53 1,631 0 1
20 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0 1986 14–14 50.0% #63 1,625 0 2
21 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,826 0 0 1987 11–14 44.0% #84 1,652 0 2
22 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0 1988 3–13 18.8% #178 1,519 0 2
23 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,603 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #444 1,514 0 2
24 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,657 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Catherine Tanvier Petra Huber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6% 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1984 5 5 10 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1985 1 6 7 14.3% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 1988 0 4 4 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 40 45 85 47.1% 51 52 103 49.5% 28 32 60 46.7% 41 46 87 47.1% — 10 27 37 27.0% 45 41 86 52.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 8 11 27.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Catherine Tanvier Petra Huber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1546 111.1 — — — — — +25 — 57.1% +0.79 2–0 0–1 — +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1540 110.2 — — — — +71 +74 +8 34.9% -1.14 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.01 1982 1564 115.4 — — — — — +61 — 60.0% +1.70 — 0–1 — +0.15
17 1982 1801 145.8 — — — — -102 -58 -144 54.0% +0.40 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 106.1 -4.11 1983 1597 121.2 — — — — -52 +132 — 45.8% -0.54 1–3 (25%) — — +0.57
18 1983 1826 138.7 — — — — +20 -51 -192 52.0% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -0.26 1984 1653 126.1 — — — — -47 +62 — 46.8% +0.15 5–5 (50%) 1–1 — +1.10
19 1984 1778 138.4 — — — — +11 +67 -119 52.4% +0.25 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 101.9 -0.85 1985 1631 127.0 — — — — -93 +117 — 40.4% -0.21 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 100.6 +0.22
20 1985 1775 131.9 — — — — -9 +35 -111 54.3% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.4 -0.41 1986 1626 120.8 — — — — -93 +110 — 50.8% -0.03 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 99.5 +1.87
21 1986 1826 142.0 — — — — +17 -76 -150 47.6% -0.15 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 108.6 -1.68 1987 1652 141.2 — — — — -127 +79 — 47.4% -0.19 2–5 (29%) 4–2 (67%) 97.3 -1.91
22 1987 1619 112.9 — — — — +55 +15 +55 38.8% -0.72 5–6 (45%) 1–7 (13%) 92.3 -0.42 1988 1520 111.0 — — — — -64 +79 — 29.7% -1.40 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.13
23 1988 1604 122.4 — — — — +7 +16 +40 40.7% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — -1.01 1989 1515 100.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.23
24 1989 1674 141.0 — — — — -11 -62 +28 50.9% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 1657 111.6 — — — — 0 -81 +75 45.0% -0.43 2–0 1–1 — +0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 1603 113.4 — — — — +31 -73 — 40.5% -0.43 4–1 (80%) 0–3 (0%) 101.2 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 1614 106.1 — — — — +44 — — 42.9% -0.57 2–0 — — +1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1578 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1879 137.0 — — — — +7 -13 -54 47.4% -0.16 49–31 (61%) 23–32 (42%) 105.2 -1.67 — 1737 132.3 — — — — -76 +93 — 44.6% -0.22 16–26 (38%) 10–12 (45%) 94.8 +1.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.