H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Catherine Tanvier vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 1-1
Catherine Tanvier and Stephanie Rehe are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on carpet, while Stephanie Rehe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1986 Filderstadt third round 2-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1986* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Catherine Tanvier | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | Stephanie Rehe | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1985* | Hershey | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Stephanie Rehe | 6-0 6-4 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stephanie Rehe | #156 | #10 | 60 | 2,000 | 134 | 98 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catherine Tanvier | Stephanie Rehe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #19 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–8 | 68.0% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,968 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #123 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #74 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |