H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Catherine Tanvier vs Wendy White H2H: 2-2
Catherine Tanvier and Wendy White are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1989 Eastbourne third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1989* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Catherine Tanvier | 7-6 6-2 | Wendy White | Match data |
| Apr 6, 1983* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Wendy White | 6-2 6-0 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
| Jan 24, 1983* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Catherine Tanvier | 0-6 6-1 6-3 | Wendy White | Match data |
| Aug 26, 1982* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Wendy White | (w/o) | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wendy White | #567 | #28 | 24 | 1,858 | 161 | 189 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catherine Tanvier | Wendy White | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–20 | 50.0% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #75 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #45 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #102 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #154 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |