H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Catherine Tanvier vs Zina Garrison H2H: 1-2

Zina Garrison holds a 2–1 lead over Catherine Tanvier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on carpet, while Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1990 Australian Open fourth round 6-2 2-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 24, 1990* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Zina Garrison #4 6-2 2-0 (ret.) Catherine Tanvier #84 Match data
Jul 3, 1985* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Zina Garrison #7 6-1 6-3 Catherine Tanvier #32 Match data
Oct 21, 1982* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Carpet Catherine Tanvier 7-6 6-4 Zina Garrison Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,877 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Catherine Tanvier Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,791 0 0 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1
18 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,824 0 0 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1
20 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,825 0 0 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,602 0 0 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,658 0 0 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,614 0 0 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 — — — — — — — 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 — — — — — — — 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15