H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Catrin Jexell vs Ginny Purdy H2H: 1-0

Catrin Jexell holds a 1–0 lead over Ginny Purdy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catrin Jexell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catrin Jexell won the 1985 Indianapolis 1 round of 32 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Catrin Jexell
SWE Age 63
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Ginny Purdy
USA Age 59

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catrin Jexell 6-1 6-2 Ginny Purdy Match data Mar 7, 1985* R32 Indianapolis 1 WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Catrin Jexell — — — 1,737 46 62 42.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ginny Purdy — — — 1,667 26 36 41.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Catrin Jexell Ginny Purdy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,474 0 0 1983 13–8 61.9% — 1,652 0 1
17 1980 6–4 60.0% — 1,545 0 0 1984 5–14 26.3% — 1,564 0 1
18 1981 6–7 46.2% — 1,544 0 0 1985 6–11 35.3% — 1,532 0 1
19 1982 14–8 63.6% — 1,661 0 1 1986 2–2 50.0% — 1,548 0 1
20 1983 12–17 41.4% — 1,648 0 1 1987 0–1 0.0% — 1,534 0 1
21 1984 5–15 25.0% — 1,536 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1985 3–8 27.3% — 1,490 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1987 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Catrin Jexell Ginny Purdy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6%
17 1980 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1981 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — —
19 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1986 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1985 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 14 26 46.2% 25 25 50 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — 11 14 25 44.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Catrin Jexell Ginny Purdy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1979 1474 98.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.04 1983 1652 112.4 — — — — +74 -86 — 55.8% -0.12 3–2 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 105.1 +2.89
17 1980 1545 112.9 — — — — — +51 — 57.1% +0.33 1–0 1–1 — +0.44 1984 1564 105.4 — — — — +90 -48 — 32.6% -0.93 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.4 +0.70
18 1981 1545 105.9 — — — — — +71 — 46.9% -0.41 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.3 +1.08 1985 1532 95.6 — — — — +60 -28 — 35.9% -1.26 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 100.3 +1.11
19 1982 1661 113.2 — — — — -96 +61 -48 60.8% +0.71 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +2.02 1986 1548 97.8 — — — — +47 — — 44.4% -1.33 1–0 1–0 — +0.41
20 1983 1649 120.8 — — — — +19 +52 -106 43.8% -0.38 2–4 (33%) 2–6 (25%) 96.3 +0.89 1987 1534 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01
21 1984 1537 103.2 — — — — +36 +101 — 27.9% -1.35 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1985 1491 107.6 — — — — +104 +58 — 32.0% -0.96 1–2 (33%) — — +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 1477 97.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1737 114.4 — — — — +17 +67 -67 44.3% -0.39 12–16 (43%) 9–13 (41%) 95.4 +6.21 — 1668 104.2 — — — — +73 -43 — 41.2% -0.83 8–8 (50%) 9–8 (53%) 102.5 +8.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.