H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cecilia Dahlman vs Catherine Mothes Jobkel H2H: 1-1
Cecilia Dahlman and Catherine Mothes Jobkel are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catherine Mothes Jobkel leads 1–0 on clay, while Cecilia Dahlman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catherine Mothes Jobkel won the 1993 Liege quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 56
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1993* | Liege | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | 6-2 6-2 | Cecilia Dahlman | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1991* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Cecilia Dahlman | 6-2 6-1 | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecilia Dahlman | #405 | #63 | 17 | 1,673 | 38 | 63 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Catherine Mothes Jobkel | — | — | — | 1,605 | 22 | 32 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cecilia Dahlman | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #165 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,640 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,495 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,499 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,513 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |