H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Cecilia Dahlman vs Emanuela Zardo H2H: 1-0

Cecilia Dahlman holds a 1–0 lead over Emanuela Zardo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cecilia Dahlman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cecilia Dahlman won the 1989 Athens round of 32 6-3 6-0.

SWE Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
SUI Age 56 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cecilia Dahlman #133 6-3 6-0 Emanuela Zardo #162 Match data Sep 14, 1989* R32 Athens WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cecilia Dahlman #405 #63 17 1,673 38 63 37.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Emanuela Zardo #976 #27 80 1,756 69 75 47.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cecilia Dahlman Emanuela Zardo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 0–1 0.0% #297 1,482 0 0
17 1987 0–1 0.0% #258 1,488 0 0
18 1988 0–1 0.0% #283 1,476 0 0
19 1988 2–5 28.6% #165 1,478 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #142 1,449 0 0
20 1989 9–9 50.0% #94 1,585 0 1 1990 13–12 52.0% #63 1,593 0 0
21 1990 16–20 44.4% #82 1,639 0 2 1991 17–11 60.7% #31 1,714 0 1
22 1991 6–18 25.0% #189 1,490 0 2 1992 18–15 54.5% #39 1,740 0 1
23 1992 2–4 33.3% #123 1,497 0 2 1993 12–16 42.9% #73 1,650 0 1
24 1993 3–6 33.3% #192 1,512 0 2 1994 9–13 40.9% #89 1,574 0 1
25 1995 0–3 0.0% #181 1,542 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cecilia Dahlman Emanuela Zardo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1988 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1991 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1993 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 6 5 11 54.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1995 0 3 3 0.0%
Career 6 18 24 25.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 15 25 40 37.5% 49 38 87 56.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 9 13 30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cecilia Dahlman Emanuela Zardo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1985 1482 96.1 0.0% -2.50 +0.21
17 1987 1488 96.8 0.0% -4.50 -0.01
18 1988 1477 101.6 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.05
19 1988 1478 107.9 +33 38.9% -0.72 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.25 1989 1450 99.4 14.3% -2.86 0–1 +0.13
20 1989 1586 124.1 -77 +74 47.6% -0.36 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.9 +1.53 1990 1594 122.2 -34 -2 50.9% +0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 +0.71
21 1990 1640 129.0 -81 +22 -22 46.3% -0.49 3–5 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 +0.28 1991 1714 136.8 -190 +100 58.1% +0.87 4–2 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 101.3 +0.08
22 1991 1490 103.6 +47 +73 +72 26.5% -1.57 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.0 +1.03 1992 1741 131.9 -208 +113 51.4% -0.15 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 106.9 -0.32
23 1992 1497 105.9 +33 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–0 +0.33 1993 1651 114.5 -126 +136 41.9% -0.50 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.1 +0.44
24 1993 1513 115.6 +90 35.0% -1.05 1–1 0–3 (0%) -0.48 1994 1575 109.2 -11 +87 41.7% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.3 +1.56
25 1995 1542 100.6 -20 0.0% -2.83 0–1 -0.22
Career 1673 122.0 -16 +52 +9 39.8% -0.82 12–16 (43%) 13–9 (59%) 101.7 +3.18 1756 126.9 -99 +89 47.0% -0.14 20–13 (61%) 14–17 (45%) 105.2 +1.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.