H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cecilia Dahlman vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 1-2
Leila Meskhi holds a 2–1 lead over Cecilia Dahlman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Leila Meskhi leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1992 Filderstadt third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1992* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 6-4 6-1 | Cecilia Dahlman | Match data |
| Nov 1, 1990* | Brentwood | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Cecilia Dahlman | 7-6 7-5 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
| Jan 19, 1990* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 2-6 6-1 6-3 | Cecilia Dahlman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecilia Dahlman | #405 | #63 | 17 | 1,673 | 38 | 63 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cecilia Dahlman | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #165 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,640 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,495 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,499 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1993 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,513 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |