H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Cecilia Martinez vs Judy Congdon H2H: 2-0
Cecilia Martinez holds a 2–0 lead over Judy Congdon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cecilia Martinez leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Cecilia Martinez won the 1969 Bristol third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1969* | Bristol | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Cecilia Martinez | 6-3 6-3 | Judy Congdon | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1968* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Cecilia Martinez | 6-1 7-5 | Judy Congdon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecilia Martinez | — | — | — | 1,710 | 121 | 157 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Judy Congdon | — | — | — | 1,536 | 35 | 48 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cecilia Martinez | Judy Congdon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1968 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1969 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1971 | 12–25 | 32.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1972 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |