H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Cecilia Martinez vs Linda Tuero H2H: 1-0

Cecilia Martinez holds a 1–0 lead over Linda Tuero in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cecilia Martinez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Cecilia Martinez won the 1968 Chestnut Hill quarterfinal 6-2 8-6.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cecilia Martinez 6-2 8-6 Linda Tuero Match data Aug 24, 1968* QF Chestnut Hill WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cecilia Martinez 1,713 121 157 43.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Linda Tuero 1,997 175 78 69.2% 0 0 0 1 12 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cecilia Martinez Linda Tuero
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 29–10 74.4% 1,734 0 3
18 1969 33–16 67.3% 1,793 0 5
19 1970 22–6 78.6% 1,873 0 9
20 1971 23–13 63.9% 1,862 0 9
21 1968 26–18 59.1% 1,662 0 0 1972 45–15 75.0% 1,894 0 13
22 1969 10–13 43.5% 1,597 0 0 1973 23–17 57.5% 1,821 0 13
23 1970 22–22 50.0% 1,688 0 1
24 1971 12–25 32.4% 1,628 0 1
25 1972 8–19 29.6% 1,547 0 1
26 1973 6–15 28.6% 1,547 0 1
27 1974 21–18 53.8% 1,652 0 1
28 1975 12–15 44.4% 1,585 0 1 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,797 0 13
29 1976 4–12 25.0% 1,561 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cecilia Martinez Linda Tuero
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1968 1 1 2 50.0% 18 5 23 78.3% 10 4 14 71.4%
18 1969 3 1 4 75.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 11 8 19 57.9%
19 1970 16 4 20 80.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1971 5 2 7 71.4% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
21 1968 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 20 12 32 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1972 14 3 17 82.4% 29 7 36 80.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1969 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1973 6 3 9 66.7% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
23 1970 6 2 8 75.0% 6 13 19 31.6% 10 7 17 58.8%
24 1971 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 7 8 12.5%
25 1972 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1973 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0%
27 1974 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
28 1975 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1976 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 20 27 47 42.6% 17 42 59 28.8% 63 56 119 52.9% 11 25 36 30.6% 29 10 39 74.4% 109 39 148 73.6% 27 24 51 52.9% 4 5 9 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cecilia Martinez Linda Tuero
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1734 135.7 +54 -40 66.7% +1.71 9–2 (82%) -0.54
18 1969 1794 136.0 -155 +107 -64 62.7% +1.15 9–3 (75%) -1.43
19 1970 1873 140.9 +125 74.1% +1.79 3–1 (75%) 0–1 -1.10
20 1971 1863 136.1 -161 +162 -176 60.9% +1.06 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) +0.17
21 1968 1662 117.1 -132 +80 57.0% +0.38 7–7 (50%) -0.62 1972 1894 152.7 -16 +210 -248 71.4% +1.79 10–5 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.2 -1.20
22 1969 1597 112.9 +3 -101 +76 42.9% -0.25 2–3 (40%) -0.23 1973 1822 130.7 +21 +161 54.5% +0.11 6–2 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 102.7 -0.14
23 1970 1689 132.1 +25 -192 +66 53.2% +0.37 2–6 (25%) 1–0 +0.68
24 1971 1629 125.6 -82 -110 +101 36.4% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 0–2 +0.12
25 1972 1547 117.8 -110 -63 +101 35.6% -1.07 0–7 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 91.6 +0.20
26 1973 1548 125.4 -123 -66 +104 35.4% -0.81 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 98.5 +0.09
27 1974 1653 130.1 -120 -179 +26 51.6% +0.43 9–6 (60%) 2–8 (20%) 99.6 +1.28
28 1975 1586 116.7 -18 -125 +131 47.6% -0.27 3–6 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 94.9 +1.45 1979 1798 97.6 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.07
29 1976 1562 114.1 -35 -100 33.3% -1.08 2–5 (29%) 2–1 (67%) -0.09
Career 1713 127.5 -71 -135 +84 45.8% -0.22 29–49 (37%) 9–17 (35%) 90.1 +1.05 1998 144.8 -36 +142 -101 65.0% +1.27 40–14 (74%) 7–6 (54%) 109.7 -1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.