H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Cecilia Martinez vs Nancy Richey H2H: 0-3
Nancy Richey holds a 3–0 lead over Cecilia Martinez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nancy Richey leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1973 Tucson fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 79
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1973* | Tucson | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nancy Richey | 6-4 6-3 | Cecilia Martinez | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1971* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Nancy Richey | 6-2 6-3 | Cecilia Martinez | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1969* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Nancy Richey | 6-3 6-3 | Cecilia Martinez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecilia Martinez | — | — | — | 1,710 | 121 | 157 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cecilia Martinez | Nancy Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 12–25 | 32.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 |
| 26 | 1973 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1974 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 |
| 28 | 1975 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 |