H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cecilia Martinez vs Penny Moor H2H: 3-0
Cecilia Martinez holds a 3–0 lead over Penny Moor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cecilia Martinez leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cecilia Martinez won the 1976 Westchester third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1976* | Westchester | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Cecilia Martinez | 6-1 6-2 | Penny Moor | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1974* | Providence | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Cecilia Martinez | 3-6 6-2 6-0 | Penny Moor | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1970* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Cecilia Martinez | 7-5 6-1 | Penny Moor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecilia Martinez | — | — | — | 1,710 | 121 | 157 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Penny Moor | — | — | — | 1,552 | 53 | 111 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cecilia Martinez | Penny Moor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1968 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 9–20 | 31.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1969 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 7–21 | 25.0% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1971 | 12–25 | 32.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1972 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,395 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |