H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cecilia Martinez vs Tory Ann Fretz H2H: 2-3
Tory Ann Fretz holds a 3–2 lead over Cecilia Martinez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tory Ann Fretz leads 2–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Cecilia Martinez won the 1971 New York fourth round 3-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1971* | New York | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Cecilia Martinez | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1971* | Rochester | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tory Ann Fretz | 7-6 6-2 | Cecilia Martinez | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1971* | Oklahoma City | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tory Ann Fretz | 1-6 6-2 6-1 | Cecilia Martinez | Match data |
| Jan 3, 1971* | Port Elizabeth | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Tory Ann Fretz | 5-7 6-0 6-1 | Cecilia Martinez | Match data |
| Dec 20, 1970* | Bloemfontein 2 | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Cecilia Martinez | 6-4 9-7 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecilia Martinez | — | — | — | 1,710 | 121 | 157 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cecilia Martinez | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 12–25 | 32.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |