H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Cecilia Martinez vs Wendy Overton H2H: 1-2
Wendy Overton holds a 2–1 lead over Cecilia Martinez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Wendy Overton leads 1–0 on carpet, while Cecilia Martinez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Wendy Overton won the 1974 Houston third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1974* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Wendy Overton | 6-1 6-2 | Cecilia Martinez | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1973* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Cecilia Martinez | 6-1 6-1 | Wendy Overton | Match data |
| Apr 14, 1973* | Quincy | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Wendy Overton | 6-1 6-4 | Cecilia Martinez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecilia Martinez | — | — | — | 1,710 | 121 | 157 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Wendy Overton | — | — | — | 1,920 | 123 | 142 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cecilia Martinez | Wendy Overton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1969 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1971 | 12–25 | 32.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1972 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 40–30 | 57.1% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 14–23 | 37.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |