H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Celine Cohen vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 0-2
Bettina Fulco holds a 2–0 lead over Celine Cohen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bettina Fulco leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Bettina Fulco won the 1989 Rome third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1989* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Bettina Fulco | 6-4 6-2 | Celine Cohen | Match data |
| Dec 12, 1987* | Guaruja | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Bettina Fulco | 6-4 6-1 | Celine Cohen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celine Cohen | — | — | — | 1,578 | 22 | 42 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Celine Cohen | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |