H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Alexandra Fusai H2H: 1-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 1–0 lead over Alexandra Fusai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1996 Key Biscayne round of 64 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Alexandra Fusai
FRA Age 52 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #9 6-2 6-0 Alexandra Fusai #83 Match data Mar 23, 1996* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Alexandra Fusai #1,030 #37 691 1,765 89 147 37.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Alexandra Fusai
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #275 1,489 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1991 0–2 0.0% #195 1,464 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1992 4–10 28.6% #131 1,454 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 1993 16–17 48.5% #79 1,582 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 1994 10–16 38.5% #92 1,567 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 1995 6–12 33.3% #105 1,540 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 1996 12–17 41.4% #59 1,554 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 1997 17–17 50.0% #50 1,669 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 1998 15–21 41.7% #39 1,675 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 1999 3–16 15.8% #177 1,528 0 0
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 2000 2–4 33.3% #144 1,528 0 0
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2001 2–10 16.7% #142 1,458 0 0
28 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 2002 2–4 33.3% #197 1,478 0 0
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanda Rubin Alexandra Fusai
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 7 7 14 50.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1996 5 7 12 41.7% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 7 5 12 58.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1998 2 6 8 25.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
25 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 1 8 9 11.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
28 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2002 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% — 24 47 71 33.8% 56 68 124 45.2% 3 14 17 17.6% 6 18 24 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanda Rubin Alexandra Fusai
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28 1990 1490 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.07
17 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 1991 1464 99.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–1 — +0.24
18 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24 1992 1454 95.4 — — — — +37 +46 — 31.3% -1.28 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.98
19 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03 1993 1583 122.7 — — — — -44 +34 — 45.6% -0.38 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 106.7 +0.89
20 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38 1994 1567 122.2 — — — — -107 +148 — 42.9% -0.59 0–4 (0%) 5–4 (56%) 96.7 +0.38
21 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41 1995 1541 107.2 — — — — -97 +127 — 36.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.60
22 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79 1996 1554 117.4 — — — — -53 +78 -36 39.7% -0.79 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 103.7 +1.06
23 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46 1997 1669 128.1 — — — — -64 +31 -163 48.0% -0.37 7–4 (64%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 -0.24
24 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47 1998 1676 126.1 — — — — -135 +112 -154 41.3% -0.82 5–3 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 103.4 -0.94
25 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54 1999 1529 103.0 — — — — -38 +137 -91 22.7% -2.34 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.19
26 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02 2000 1528 107.4 — — — — -23 +112 — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 — — +0.15
27 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62 2001 1459 97.2 — — — — -24 +150 — 27.6% -1.59 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — +0.15
28 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02 2002 1479 113.9 — — — — — +111 — 38.5% -0.15 0–1 — — -0.16
29 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 — 1766 120.9 — — — — -61 +92 -114 39.1% -0.86 35–34 (51%) 28–30 (48%) 103.7 +1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.