H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Anke Huber H2H: 1-1

Chanda Rubin and Anke Huber are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on grass, while Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1998 Sydney third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 14, 1998* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #31 6-2 6-3 Anke Huber #14 Match data
Jul 2, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Anke Huber #10 6-2 6-4 Chanda Rubin #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Anke Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —