H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Antonella Serra Zanetti H2H: 1-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 1–0 lead over Antonella Serra Zanetti in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2004 US Open round of 64 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Antonella Serra Zanetti
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #22 7-5 6-3 Antonella Serra Zanetti #116 Match data Sep 2, 2004* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Antonella Serra Zanetti #963 #60 536 1,576 49 92 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Antonella Serra Zanetti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #466 1,494 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #183 1,512 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1999 1–3 25.0% #185 1,500 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 2002 5–11 31.2% #92 1,490 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 2003 11–20 35.5% #111 1,473 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 2004 9–13 40.9% #100 1,525 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 2005 18–24 42.9% #64 1,557 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 2006 3–17 15.0% #322 1,422 0 0
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 2007 0–1 0.0% #333 1,414 0 0
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanda Rubin Antonella Serra Zanetti
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1998 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1999 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2002 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2003 5 10 15 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2005 10 13 23 43.5% 6 9 15 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2006 0 5 5 0.0% 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% — 26 44 70 37.1% 20 40 60 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanda Rubin Antonella Serra Zanetti
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85 1996 1494 100.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.19
16 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 1998 1512 105.1 — — — — — +40 — 50.0% -0.10 1–1 1–1 — +0.02
18 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24 1999 1501 108.4 — — — — — +29 — 40.0% -0.90 0–2 — — -0.12
19 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41 2002 1490 99.5 — — — — +56 -45 — 31.6% -1.53 4–2 (67%) 1–0 — +0.56
22 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79 2003 1474 107.0 -2.02 +0.51 0.935 48.4% +37 -1 — 37.5% -0.94 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.5 +0.91
23 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46 2004 1526 113.3 -0.92 +0.28 0.990 49.8% -1 -22 — 38.6% -0.70 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.35
24 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47 2005 1558 102.6 -2.82 -1.38 0.796 44.9% -3 -91 -26 43.9% -0.75 7–7 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.9 +1.45
25 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54 2006 1423 94.6 -5.03 -1.11 0.833 45.6% +60 -15 — 23.9% -1.87 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.11
26 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02 2007 1414 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.06
27 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 — 1577 105.3 -3.36 -0.69 0.863 46.6% +20 -28 -26 37.0% -1.05 19–23 (45%) 11–12 (48%) 101.8 +1.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.