H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 3-4

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 4–3 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 3–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2002 Madrid fourth round 6-3 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 24, 2002* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Chanda Rubin #65 6-3 7-6(6) Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #18 Match data
Jan 26, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Chanda Rubin #14 6-4 2-6 16-14 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #3 Match data
Aug 12, 1995* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 SF Hard Chanda Rubin #22 6-3 6-1 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #2 Match data
Jun 8, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #1 6-3 6-1 Chanda Rubin #53 Match data
Mar 4, 1995* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #1 7-6 6-2 Chanda Rubin #35 Match data
Mar 5, 1994* Delray Beach WTA 250 SF Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #2 6-2 6-3 Chanda Rubin #34 Match data
Sep 5, 1993* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #3 6-0 6-1 Chanda Rubin #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #52 #1 3,768 2,385 708 267 72.6% 4 7 0 1 17 29

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 1986 15–10 60.0% #81 1,620 0 0
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #54 1,639 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1988 31–15 67.4% #18 1,809 0 1
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1989 47–13 78.3% #5 2,068 1 3
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1990 38–14 73.1% #7 2,081 1 5
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1991 56–15 78.9% #5 2,166 1 6
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1992 59–15 79.7% #4 2,288 1 8
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1993 72–14 83.7% #2 2,248 1 12
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1994 69–9 88.5% #2 2,333 3 20
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1995 47–13 78.3% #3 2,156 3 22
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1996 52–16 76.5% #3 2,106 3 24
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1997 45–22 67.2% #9 2,022 3 24
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1998 47–17 73.4% #4 2,039 4 26
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1999 25–17 59.5% #17 1,932 4 27
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 2000 38–18 67.9% #8 1,930 4 27
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 2001 34–22 60.7% #17 1,795 4 29
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 2002 21–24 46.7% #53 1,634 4 29