H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 3-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 3–1 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2004 Australian Open round of 128 6-3 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Asa Carlsson
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #10 6-3 4-6 6-3 Asa Carlsson #294 Match data Jan 21, 2004* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Chanda Rubin #27 6-3 6-2 Asa Carlsson #52 Match data Jun 26, 2002* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chanda Rubin #18 6-2 6-2 Asa Carlsson #44 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Asa Carlsson #96 6-2 6-7 6-2 Chanda Rubin #38 Match data Apr 14, 1995* R16 Houston Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Asa Carlsson #1,024 #28 831 1,817 128 171 42.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Asa Carlsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #202 1,484 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1993 4–7 36.4% #164 1,500 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 1994 15–16 48.4% #70 1,640 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 1995 22–19 53.7% #49 1,748 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 1996 15–19 44.1% #39 1,738 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 1997 18–22 45.0% #45 1,666 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 1998 8–13 38.1% #92 1,603 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 1999 14–12 53.8% #61 1,658 0 1
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 2000 12–16 42.9% #57 1,632 0 1
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 2001 6–21 22.2% #102 1,514 0 1
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2002 12–13 48.0% #78 1,570 0 2
28 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 2003 1–7 12.5% #345 1,495 0 2
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 2004 1–5 16.7% #207 1,465 0 2
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanda Rubin Asa Carlsson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1993 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 4 5 9 44.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
21 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1996 7 8 15 46.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1997 9 9 18 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
23 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1999 9 3 12 75.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2001 1 9 10 10.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 2 6 8 25.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2003 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% — 50 73 123 40.7% 59 61 120 49.2% 4 11 15 26.7% 15 26 41 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanda Rubin Asa Carlsson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 1992 1485 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.16
18 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24 1993 1501 102.4 — — — — +21 +53 — 33.3% -1.33 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — -0.02
19 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03 1994 1640 133.8 — — — — -64 +27 — 49.3% -0.05 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 -0.18
20 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38 1995 1748 136.0 — — — — -64 -7 — 53.1% -0.17 7–7 (50%) 8–3 (73%) 104.2 -0.88
21 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41 1996 1738 141.8 — — — — +2 -54 — 45.7% -0.35 6–9 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 97.6 -1.29
22 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79 1997 1666 133.5 — — — — +33 -20 -109 42.0% -0.69 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.9 -1.60
23 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46 1998 1603 112.8 — — — — +15 +34 — 41.3% -0.76 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.61
24 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47 1999 1659 119.8 — — — — +23 -52 — 50.8% +0.08 6–3 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 99.5 +1.33
25 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54 2000 1632 121.3 — — — — -10 +42 — 40.6% -0.83 6–2 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 108.5 -1.52
26 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02 2001 1515 111.4 — — — — -6 +100 — 33.8% -1.31 1–10 (9%) 3–4 (43%) 89.6 -0.05
27 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62 2002 1571 118.5 — — — — -98 +116 — 50.0% -0.22 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.1 -0.43
28 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02 2003 1496 100.4 — — — — -79 +158 — 33.3% -1.22 0–4 (0%) — — -0.08
29 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 2004 1465 105.4 -0.90 -0.66 0.885 47.3% -55 — — 28.6% -1.71 0–2 1–0 — -0.09
30 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 — 1817 131.0 -0.90 -0.66 0.885 47.3% -15 +33 -109 44.3% -0.55 44–55 (44%) 27–24 (53%) 99.7 -1.36

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.