H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 3-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 3–1 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2004 Australian Open first round 6-3 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Asa Carlsson
SWE Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 21, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Chanda Rubin #10 6-3 4-6 6-3 Asa Carlsson #294 Match data
Jun 26, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Chanda Rubin #27 6-3 6-2 Asa Carlsson #52 Match data
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Chanda Rubin #18 6-2 6-2 Asa Carlsson #44 Match data
Apr 14, 1995* Houston WTA 250 R16 Clay Asa Carlsson #96 6-2 6-7 6-2 Chanda Rubin #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Asa Carlsson #1,024 #28 831 1,816 128 171 42.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Chanda Rubin Asa Carlsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #202 1,484 0 0
1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1993 4–7 36.4% #164 1,500 0 0
1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1994 15–16 48.4% #70 1,640 0 0
1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1995 22–19 53.7% #49 1,748 0 0
1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1996 15–19 44.1% #39 1,737 0 0
1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1997 18–22 45.0% #45 1,685 0 0
1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1998 8–13 38.1% #92 1,611 0 0
1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1999 14–12 53.8% #61 1,662 0 1
1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 2000 12–16 42.9% #57 1,634 0 1
1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 2001 6–21 22.2% #102 1,515 0 1
2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 2002 12–13 48.0% #78 1,571 0 2
2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 2003 1–7 12.5% #345 1,496 0 2
2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 2004 1–5 16.7% #207 1,465 0 2
2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 — — — — — — —
2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 — — — — — — —
2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 — — — — — — —
2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —