H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Barbara Paulus H2H: 1-1

Chanda Rubin and Barbara Paulus are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Paulus won the 1998 Berlin Open round of 64 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Barbara Paulus
AUT Age 56 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Paulus #29 6-4 6-2 Chanda Rubin #72 Match data May 13, 1998* R64 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Chanda Rubin #30 6-4 7-6 Barbara Paulus #18 Match data Apr 9, 1997* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Barbara Paulus #347 #10 1,696 1,957 232 140 62.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Barbara Paulus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1986 4–3 57.1% #165 1,528 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 1987 11–10 52.4% #70 1,594 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1988 21–11 65.6% #27 1,755 0 1
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1989 30–16 65.2% #24 1,835 0 1
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 1990 32–14 69.6% #15 1,895 0 2
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 1991 17–13 56.7% #25 1,846 0 2
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 1992 4–8 33.3% #209 1,719 0 2
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 1994 5–7 41.7% #108 1,659 0 2
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 1995 21–7 75.0% #23 1,798 0 4
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 1996 38–16 70.4% #10 1,868 0 5
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 1997 32–16 66.7% #24 1,878 0 6
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1998 17–19 47.2% #45 1,751 0 6
28 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanda Rubin Barbara Paulus
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
16 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1987 — — — — 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 6 2 8 75.0% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1989 11 6 17 64.7% 19 9 28 67.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 16 7 23 69.6% 9 1 10 90.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
20 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 9 9 18 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0%
21 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1992 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1995 9 2 11 81.8% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1996 8 5 13 61.5% 22 6 28 78.6% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5%
26 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1997 5 4 9 55.6% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
27 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% — 75 55 130 57.7% 120 56 176 68.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 35 23 58 60.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanda Rubin Barbara Paulus
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85 1986 1529 102.3 — — — — — +50 — 52.9% -0.47 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.85
16 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28 1987 1594 117.4 — — — — — +61 — 52.2% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — +2.31
17 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 1988 1756 133.5 — — — — -127 +35 — 61.1% +0.69 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 107.4 +1.41
18 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24 1989 1835 142.7 — — — — -98 +11 — 58.0% +0.71 15–5 (75%) 1–5 (17%) 103.7 -1.53
19 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03 1990 1896 143.9 — — — — -23 +25 — 63.7% +0.76 13–8 (62%) 5–3 (63%) 103.5 +1.16
20 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38 1991 1846 140.0 — — — — 0 — — 53.8% +0.29 6–3 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 101.6 -1.04
21 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41 1992 1720 104.4 — — — — +20 +127 — 37.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.05
22 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46 1994 1660 112.9 — — — — +3 — — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.39
24 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47 1995 1799 130.3 — — — — -17 +64 — 67.2% +1.11 7–1 (88%) 4–0 (100%) 110.4 +2.57
25 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54 1996 1869 151.5 — — — — -65 +97 — 67.2% +1.23 9–12 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 94.9 +0.39
26 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02 1997 1878 149.1 — — — — -57 +105 — 64.8% +1.27 9–6 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 100.4 +3.06
27 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62 1998 1751 136.5 — — — — +25 +129 — 46.3% -0.34 7–5 (58%) 2–1 (67%) 100.4 -0.80
28 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 — 1958 145.3 — — — — -35 +69 — 58.7% +0.60 78–50 (61%) 34–26 (57%) 105.4 +2.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.