H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 2-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2000 Berlin second round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 8, 2000* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Chanda Rubin #25 6-1 6-4 Barbara Rittner #99 Match data
Apr 8, 1998* Amelia Island WTA 250 R64 Clay Barbara Rittner #97 7-6 6-1 Chanda Rubin #58 Match data
Feb 15, 1997* Linz WTA 500 QF Carpet Chanda Rubin #22 4-6 7-6 6-4 Barbara Rittner #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,883 209 217 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Barbara Rittner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1992 23–15 60.5% #29 1,829 0 1
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,838 0 1
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,818 0 1
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,728 0 1
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,728 0 1
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,653 0 1
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,664 0 1
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,655 0 1
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,632 0 2
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,568 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,571 0 2