H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Barbara Schett H2H: 4-4

Chanda Rubin and Barbara Schett are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2003 Shanghai fourth round 7-6(1) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 4
8 main draw meetings
Barbara Schett
AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 19, 2003* Shanghai WTA 500 R16 Hard Chanda Rubin #9 7-6(1) 6-2 Barbara Schett #73 Match data
Oct 10, 2002* Filderstadt WTA 500 R32 Hard Barbara Schett #44 1-6 6-2 6-2 Chanda Rubin #13 Match data
Aug 15, 2002* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Barbara Schett #35 6-4 6-4 Chanda Rubin #15 Match data
May 30, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Chanda Rubin #45 5-7 6-3 7-5 Barbara Schett #19 Match data
Oct 11, 2001* Filderstadt WTA 500 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #33 6-2 7-5 Barbara Schett #18 Match data
Aug 2, 2001* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Barbara Schett #23 7-6(4) 6-4 Chanda Rubin #26 Match data
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Chanda Rubin #18 2-6 6-1 6-1 Barbara Schett #20 Match data
Apr 14, 2000* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Barbara Schett #13 6-0 6-2 Chanda Rubin #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,975 256 227 53.0% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Barbara Schett
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,487 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,531 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,585 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,762 0 2
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,936 0 2
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 2000 27–22 55.1% #22 1,815 0 3
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,757 0 3
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,750 0 3
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,624 0 3
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,590 0 3
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,591 0 3
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —