H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 1-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 1–0 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1993 Key Biscayne first round 6-4 4-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 13, 1993* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R128 Hard Chanda Rubin #88 6-4 4-6 6-0 Betsy Nagelsen #391 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6