H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 0-4

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 4–0 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1997 Chicago third round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 6, 1997* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #15 6-4 7-5 Chanda Rubin #29 Match data
Oct 25, 1997* Quebec City WTA 250 SF Carpet Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #16 6-2 6-4 Chanda Rubin #32 Match data
Jun 25, 1993* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #31 4-6 6-2 6-2 Chanda Rubin #50 Match data
May 27, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #29 6-2 5-7 6-4 Chanda Rubin #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7