H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Gigi Fernandez H2H: 3-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 3–1 lead over Gigi Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Gigi Fernandez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1995 US Open third round 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Gigi Fernandez
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #16 7-6 6-1 Gigi Fernandez #29 Match data
Aug 10, 1995* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #22 4-6 6-1 7-6 Gigi Fernandez #31 Match data
Jun 23, 1995* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Chanda Rubin #29 6-4 4-6 6-1 Gigi Fernandez #18 Match data
Apr 17, 1992* Houston WTA 250 R16 Clay Gigi Fernandez #21 6-1 6-3 Chanda Rubin #90 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Gigi Fernandez #181 #17 247 1,912 227 217 51.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Gigi Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1983 4–8 33.3% — 1,524 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1984 18–16 52.9% #27 1,723 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1985 9–18 33.3% #64 1,655 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1986 17–14 54.8% #57 1,729 0 1
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1987 16–17 48.5% #39 1,681 0 1
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1988 15–18 45.5% #53 1,684 0 1
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1989 23–15 60.5% #23 1,810 0 1
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1990 18–14 56.2% #36 1,765 0 1
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1991 30–18 62.5% #22 1,809 0 2
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 1992 22–16 57.9% #32 1,806 0 2
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 1993 17–17 50.0% #50 1,730 0 2
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 1994 17–17 50.0% #32 1,789 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1995 11–13 45.8% #65 1,738 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 7–12 36.8% #112 1,687 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 3–3 50.0% #180 1,707 0 2