H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Chanda Rubin vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 3-1
Chanda Rubin holds a 3–1 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1998 Wimbledon first round 4-6 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Chanda Rubin | 4-6 6-0 6-2 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| Aug 26, 1993* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ginger Helgeson | 6-2 6-1 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1992* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Chanda Rubin | 1-6 7-5 6-2 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| Nov 2, 1991* | Scottsdale | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Chanda Rubin | 6-3 7-5 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | #1,122 | #6 | 2,554 | 2,047 | 343 | 231 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chanda Rubin | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #84 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #23 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,945 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 20–9 | 69.0% | #17 | 1,989 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #32 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #13 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #52 | 1,860 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #545 | 1,823 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #486 | 1,719 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |