H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 1-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 1–0 lead over Judith Wiesner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1997 Key Biscayne round of 32 3-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Judith Wiesner
AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #25 3-6 6-3 7-5 Judith Wiesner #16 Match data Mar 23, 1997* R32 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,976 303 179 62.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Judith Wiesner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,695 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,753 0 1
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,735 0 2
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 1992 29–18 61.7% #25 1,911 0 3
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,905 0 3
28 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,894 0 4
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,915 0 5
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 1996 36–23 61.0% #15 1,922 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,826 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanda Rubin Judith Wiesner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 6 4 10 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1990 21 7 28 75.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1994 14 8 22 63.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 11 6 17 64.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 15 9 24 62.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 5 10 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
Career — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% — 106 64 170 62.4% 131 72 203 64.5% 25 13 38 65.8% 41 30 71 57.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanda Rubin Judith Wiesner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03 1985 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.09
20 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38 1986 1514 117.4 — — — — — +64 — 53.3% +0.60 1–2 (33%) — — +0.77
21 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41 1987 1696 127.6 — — — — -111 +11 -79 57.1% +0.56 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 104.5 +2.26
22 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79 1988 1754 146.4 — — — — -139 +74 — 53.7% +0.41 10–7 (59%) 4–1 (80%) 106.3 -0.01
23 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46 1989 1736 132.1 — — — — -75 +91 -114 61.0% +0.74 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 100.4 +3.28
24 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47 1990 1846 152.4 — — — — -25 +17 -141 64.7% +1.10 9–6 (60%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.74
25 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54 1991 1963 155.9 — — — — -24 -50 -187 61.1% +0.73 9–1 (90%) 3–4 (43%) 108.4 -2.10
26 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02 1992 1912 147.1 — — — — -3 +17 -128 57.7% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.07
27 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62 1993 1906 147.9 — — — — -21 +50 — 60.4% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 102.1 -1.43
28 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02 1994 1894 149.7 — — — — -18 +42 — 63.5% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 96.6 +0.38
29 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 1995 1915 149.4 — — — — +25 -25 -156 61.8% +1.24 11–7 (61%) 2–9 (18%) 92.9 -1.06
30 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 1996 1923 154.0 — — — — +7 -98 -7 59.8% +0.61 7–7 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -2.40
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1826 137.1 — — — — +35 -4 +98 61.8% +0.87 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 95.1 +0.60
Career — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 — 1976 153.6 — — — — -20 +18 -79 60.2% +0.76 84–63 (57%) 50–36 (58%) 106.1 -0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.