H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 3-1 (incl. walkovers)

Chanda Rubin vs Julie Halard-Decugis: 2–1 excluding walkovers; 3–1 including 1 walkover. Across 4 main-draw results including walkovers, Chanda Rubin leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2000 Los Angeles round of 32 6-2 6-1.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H including walkovers
3 1
4 main-draw results
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #19 6-2 6-1 Julie Halard-Decugis #14 Match data Aug 10, 2000* R32 Los Angeles Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Julie Halard-Decugis #14 6-2 3-6 6-4 Chanda Rubin #20 Match data Jun 24, 2000* SF Eastbourne Open Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Chanda Rubin #23 7-6 6-2 Julie Halard-Decugis #16 Match data Aug 5, 1999* R32 San Diego Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Chanda Rubin #31 (w/o) Julie Halard-Decugis #20 Match data Jan 16, 1999* SF Hobart International Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,024 340 221 60.6% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Julie Halard-Decugis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,612 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,624 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,707 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,820 0 1
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 1992 23–14 62.2% #27 1,819 0 2
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,819 0 2
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,889 0 3
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,916 0 8
28 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,930 0 10
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 2000 31–24 56.4% #15 1,837 0 12
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanda Rubin Julie Halard-Decugis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
15 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 10 6 16 62.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 26 13 39 66.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1993 19 11 30 63.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 19 14 33 57.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 13 4 17 76.5% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 1997 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 18 12 30 60.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1999 22 11 33 66.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 18 13 31 58.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 2006 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% 164 109 273 60.1% 117 62 179 65.4% 31 17 48 64.6% 28 33 61 45.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanda Rubin Julie Halard-Decugis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1489 99.2 0.0% -3.00 +0.06
15 1991 1584 123.6 +18 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85
16 1992 1617 121.6 +45 -100 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28 1987 1643 124.0 -39 +21 58.8% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 5–1 (83%) 107.7 +1.12
17 1993 1653 130.3 -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 -0.24 1988 1612 123.0 -40 +60 -85 45.0% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 2–7 (22%) 95.8 -0.31
18 1994 1804 148.9 +16 -107 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24 1989 1625 118.1 -29 -13 39.7% -0.70 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 -0.36
19 1995 1934 157.2 -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03 1990 1708 138.4 -46 +7 -172 52.9% +0.32 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 102.8 -1.86
20 1996 1986 164.3 +40 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38 1991 1821 141.7 -31 +28 -239 59.2% +0.73 18–5 (78%) 5–1 (83%) 112.4 +1.15
21 1997 1814 153.7 +40 +33 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41 1992 1819 144.0 -103 +139 -169 57.1% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 3–5 (38%) 104.1 -1.82
22 1998 1800 144.1 +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79 1993 1819 145.9 +15 +29 59.2% +0.48 6–6 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 105.4 +1.92
23 1999 1839 156.4 +47 -68 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46 1994 1890 153.5 -51 +106 60.0% +0.46 14–8 (64%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.05
24 2000 1941 157.5 +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47 1995 1771 131.9 -28 +220 55.1% +0.33 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.1 +0.60
25 2001 1816 133.7 +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54 1996 1856 152.1 -18 +132 69.0% +1.29 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 -0.28
26 2002 1962 162.2 -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02 1997 1843 108.4 33.3% -1.67 0–1 -0.22
27 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62 1998 1917 157.6 -29 +48 -109 60.5% +0.78 7–7 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 100.1 -3.44
28 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02 1999 1930 160.9 -32 +91 -17 63.8% +0.88 14–5 (74%) 8–4 (67%) 110.3 +0.13
29 2005 1821 106.0 33.3% -1.17 -0.30 2000 1837 145.6 +5 +79 +214 52.5% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 102.6 +1.49
30 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 12.5% -2.75 -0.69
Career 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 2024 152.3 -27 +76 -46 57.5% +0.49 110–64 (63%) 67–50 (57%) 111.7 -0.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.