H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 3-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 3–1 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2000 Los Angeles third round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Julie Halard-Decugis
FRA Age 55 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 10, 2000* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #19 6-2 6-1 Julie Halard-Decugis #14 Match data
Jun 24, 2000* Eastbourne WTA 500 SF Grass Julie Halard-Decugis #14 6-2 3-6 6-4 Chanda Rubin #20 Match data
Aug 5, 1999* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #23 7-6 6-2 Julie Halard-Decugis #16 Match data
Jan 16, 1999* Hobart WTA 250 SF Hard Chanda Rubin #31 (w/o) Julie Halard-Decugis #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,003 337 219 60.6% 0 0 0 3 9 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Julie Halard-Decugis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,613 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,625 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,708 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,821 0 1
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1992 22–13 62.9% #27 1,837 0 2
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,821 0 2
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,890 0 3
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,917 0 8
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,920 0 10
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 2000 29–23 55.8% #15 1,829 0 12
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —