H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Karina Habsudova H2H: 4-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 4–0 lead over Karina Habsudova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2000 Indian Wells fourth round 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Karina Habsudova
SVK Age 52 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 14, 2000* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Chanda Rubin #29 6-0 6-1 Karina Habsudova #67 Match data
Feb 16, 1997* Linz WTA 500 F Carpet Chanda Rubin #22 6-4 6-2 Karina Habsudova #10 Match data
Mar 26, 1996* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 SF Hard Chanda Rubin #9 4-6 6-4 6-2 Karina Habsudova #98 Match data
Nov 2, 1991* Scottsdale WTA 250 SF Hard Chanda Rubin #138 6-2 6-4 Karina Habsudova #90 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Karina Habsudova #792 #10 2,022 1,953 168 172 49.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Karina Habsudova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1990 2–1 66.7% #124 1,536 0 0
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1991 14–15 48.3% #54 1,671 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1992 9–14 39.1% #66 1,663 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1993 7–12 36.8% #113 1,627 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1994 15–12 55.6% #31 1,795 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1995 14–13 51.9% #56 1,732 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1996 36–21 63.2% #11 1,863 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1997 23–23 50.0% #29 1,756 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1998 9–17 34.6% #70 1,686 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1999 21–15 58.3% #49 1,763 0 1
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 2000 12–19 38.7% #85 1,648 0 1
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2001 6–10 37.5% #123 1,608 0 1
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —