H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Katerina Maleeva H2H: 3-2

Chanda Rubin holds a 3–2 lead over Katerina Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Katerina Maleeva leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1996 Oklahoma fourth round 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Katerina Maleeva
BUL Age 57 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 24, 1996* Oklahoma WTA 250 R16 Hard Chanda Rubin #10 7-6 6-1 Katerina Maleeva #285 Match data
Nov 5, 1994* Quebec City WTA 250 SF Carpet Katerina Maleeva #41 4-6 6-4 6-3 Chanda Rubin #29 Match data
Jan 19, 1994* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Chanda Rubin #62 6-4 6-3 Katerina Maleeva #21 Match data
Nov 13, 1992* Indianapolis WTA 250 R16 Hard Katerina Maleeva #13 6-1 6-2 Chanda Rubin #96 Match data
Sep 6, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #75 6-4 3-6 6-4 Katerina Maleeva #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Katerina Maleeva #456 #6 116 2,070 324 185 63.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Katerina Maleeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 1984 2–2 50.0% #93 1,528 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 1985 30–20 60.0% #28 1,813 0 2
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1986 24–20 54.5% #29 1,838 0 2
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1987 35–15 70.0% #13 1,948 0 4
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1988 35–16 68.6% #11 1,992 0 5
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1989 32–11 74.4% #15 1,940 0 8
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1990 47–16 74.6% #6 2,039 0 9
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1991 35–16 68.6% #11 1,967 0 10
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1992 30–18 62.5% #16 1,906 0 10
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1993 28–17 62.2% #22 1,898 0 10
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1994 20–16 55.6% #36 1,866 0 11
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1995 1–11 8.3% #302 1,679 0 11
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1996 5–7 41.7% #231 1,686 0 11
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —