H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Katrina Adams H2H: 2-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 2–0 lead over Katrina Adams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1996 Oklahoma quarterfinal 4-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Katrina Adams
USA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #10 4-6 6-2 6-1 Katrina Adams #164 Match data Feb 25, 1996* QF Oklahoma Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Chanda Rubin #15 6-2 6-2 Katrina Adams #117 Match data Oct 5, 1995* R32 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Katrina Adams #625 #67 199 1,607 55 114 32.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Katrina Adams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1987 1–3 25.0% #167 1,484 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 1988 10–15 40.0% #96 1,539 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 1989 14–25 35.9% #84 1,573 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 1990 1–11 8.3% #256 1,470 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 1991 7–7 50.0% #91 1,571 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 1992 6–15 28.6% #143 1,537 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 1993 4–10 28.6% #184 1,531 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 1994 2–7 22.2% #144 1,511 0 0
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 1995 3–8 27.3% #116 1,507 0 0
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1996 7–10 41.2% #115 1,555 0 0
28 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 1997 0–2 0.0% #278 1,524 0 0
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 1998 0–1 0.0% #625 1,515 0 0
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanda Rubin Katrina Adams
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1987 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 6 7 13 46.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
20 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 8 12 20 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6%
21 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1990 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1991 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1993 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1995 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1997 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% — 34 51 85 40.0% 3 21 24 12.5% 13 20 33 39.4% 5 22 27 18.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanda Rubin Katrina Adams
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24 1987 1485 104.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.25 — — — +0.42
19 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03 1988 1540 107.3 — — — — +17 -104 +79 41.1% -0.98 3–3 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 104.1 +0.75
20 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38 1989 1573 119.5 — — — — +5 -143 +43 38.0% -0.89 9–7 (56%) 8–9 (47%) 105.7 +0.11
21 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41 1990 1471 103.4 — — — — -8 — +146 21.4% -1.64 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.7 +0.18
22 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79 1991 1572 124.7 — — — — -6 — — 44.1% -0.76 5–1 (83%) 5–1 (83%) 110.6 +0.43
23 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46 1992 1538 111.1 — — — — +21 -145 +41 29.5% -1.59 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.5 +0.39
24 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47 1993 1531 120.1 — — — — -36 -85 +137 35.3% -1.24 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 102.7 -0.13
25 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54 1994 1512 124.6 — — — — +10 — — 30.4% -0.39 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 100.9 -0.56
26 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02 1995 1508 111.9 — — — — +22 — — 30.8% -1.54 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.29
27 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62 1996 1555 119.5 — — — — +44 -140 +1 43.9% -0.63 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.18
28 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02 1997 1525 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.20
29 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 1998 1515 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.10
30 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 — 1607 121.2 — — — — +9 -122 +69 35.5% -1.08 27–31 (47%) 24–22 (52%) 107.7 +1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.