H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 2-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 2–1 lead over Kimberly Po Messerli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kimberly Po Messerli won the 1998 S Hertogenbosch quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Kimberly Po Messerli
Age 54 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 15, 1998 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 QF Grass Kimberly Po Messerli 6-2 6-3 Chanda Rubin #59 Match data
May 19, 1994* Lucerne WTA 250 R32 Clay Chanda Rubin #28 6-2 6-4 Kimberly Po Messerli Match data
Feb 11, 1994* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Chanda Rubin #47 6-2 2-6 6-2 Kimberly Po Messerli Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Kimberly Po Messerli — — — 1,878 118 133 47.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Kimberly Po Messerli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1991 5–4 55.6% — 1,568 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1992 14–16 46.7% — 1,655 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1993 20–19 51.3% — 1,776 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1994 11–17 39.3% — 1,701 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1995 4–13 23.5% — 1,609 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1996 20–13 60.6% — 1,806 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1997 27–20 57.4% — 1,789 0 0
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1998 11–15 42.3% — 1,742 0 0
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1999 6–13 31.6% — 1,653 0 0
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 2000 0–2 0.0% — 1,611 0 0
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —