H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-1

Chanda Rubin and Kimiko Date Krumm are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on grass, while Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 Sydney quarterfinal 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 13, 1996* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-0 6-1 Chanda Rubin #15 Match data
Jun 24, 1995* Eastbourne WTA 250 QF Grass Chanda Rubin #29 6-3 6-0 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8