H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Kristie Boogert H2H: 4-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 4–1 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2001 Canberra third round 6-4 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 10, 2001* Canberra WTA 250 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #13 6-4 7-6(7) Kristie Boogert #67 Match data
Jun 23, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Kristie Boogert #87 6-4 7-5 Chanda Rubin #23 Match data
Jan 8, 1999* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Chanda Rubin #35 6-4 7-5 Kristie Boogert #83 Match data
Jun 21, 1995* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Chanda Rubin #29 7-6 6-1 Kristie Boogert #54 Match data
Oct 29, 1992* San Juan WTA 250 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #59 6-2 6-3 Kristie Boogert #151 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 104 139 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Kristie Boogert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,494 0 0
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,713 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,680 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,615 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,604 0 0
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 2000 11–13 45.8% #66 1,623 0 0
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,531 0 0
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,537 0 0
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 — — — — — — —