H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 2-0

Chanda Rubin holds a 2–0 lead over Laura Golarsa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 1995 Eastbourne third round 6-7 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Laura Golarsa
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 1995* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Chanda Rubin #29 6-7 6-4 6-2 Laura Golarsa #130 Match data
Jun 12, 1993* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Chanda Rubin #62 2-6 7-5 6-4 Laura Golarsa #137 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Laura Golarsa #693 #39 436 1,761 127 180 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Laura Golarsa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1985 5–1 83.3% #166 1,563 0 1
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1986 5–5 50.0% #167 1,593 0 1
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0 1987 6–10 37.5% #121 1,575 0 1
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0 1988 11–14 44.0% #79 1,619 0 1
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1 1989 22–18 55.0% #58 1,706 0 1
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1 1990 14–16 46.7% #61 1,689 0 1
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2 1991 3–13 18.8% #213 1,546 0 1
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3 1992 5–10 33.3% #125 1,522 0 1
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3 1993 17–18 48.6% #69 1,637 0 1
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5 1994 13–22 37.1% #112 1,582 0 1
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 1995 5–10 33.3% #149 1,551 0 1
28 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7 1996 1–8 11.1% #145 1,468 0 1
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7 1997 7–9 43.8% #62 1,532 0 1
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7 1998 10–16 38.5% #94 1,570 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1999 3–10 23.1% #168 1,513 0 1