H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Chanda Rubin vs Laura Granville H2H: 2-1

Chanda Rubin holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Granville in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2005 Cincinnati Open round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Laura Granville
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #125 6-3 6-4 Laura Granville #63 Match data Jul 21, 2005* R32 Cincinnati Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Chanda Rubin #8 2-6 6-1 6-3 Laura Granville #30 Match data Jun 1, 2003* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Laura Granville #37 4-6 6-2 6-1 Chanda Rubin #12 Match data Feb 28, 2003* R16 Scottsdale Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Laura Granville #466 #28 1,063 1,699 86 108 44.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chanda Rubin Laura Granville
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0 1998 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
18 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #841 1,501 0 0
19 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0 2001 0–3 0.0% #220 1,485 0 0
21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1 2002 11–10 52.4% #49 1,637 0 0
22 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1 2003 22–22 50.0% #46 1,652 0 0
23 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2 2004 17–19 47.2% #74 1,600 0 0
24 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3 2005 12–15 44.4% #60 1,613 0 0
25 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3 2006 12–16 42.9% #68 1,588 0 0
26 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5 2007 11–15 42.3% #61 1,612 0 0
27 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7 2008 0–2 0.0% #379 1,593 0 0
28 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7 2009 0–2 0.0% #293 1,565 0 0
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7 2010 0–2 0.0% #448 1,541 0 0
30 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chanda Rubin Laura Granville
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2003 11 13 24 45.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2005 7 13 20 35.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2006 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9% — 60 75 135 44.4% 6 19 25 24.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 5 3 8 62.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 22/100 of Chanda Rubin's and 71/167 of Laura Granville's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Chanda Rubin Laura Granville
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 8/44 1.4 2.8 61.8% 60.8% 50.1% 51.8% 41.7% 56.7% 47.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/36 1.0 2.4 61.3% 58.6% 50.7% 61.2% 54.8% 55.6% 42.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 9/27 1.1 1.6 65.1% 64.3% 53.0% 50.2% 56.4% 60.4% 39.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 20/28 1.7 2.6 63.3% 64.3% 46.6% 60.2% 45.3% 58.0% 42.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 23/26 1.8 2.3 67.0% 59.8% 46.1% 58.3% 50.4% 55.3% 40.4%
27 2003 9/63 2.6 3.1 60.3% 59.5% 50.1% 50.9% 48.1% 56.0% 48.6% 2008 2/2 3.0 1.0 73.1% 51.1% 42.9% 43.7% 22.5% 48.9% 30.0%
28 2004 7/29 1.0 2.9 63.3% 64.2% 47.5% 49.3% 53.5% 58.1% 48.4% 2009 2/2 1.5 1.5 56.1% 54.9% 44.4% 29.2% 0.0% 50.3% 29.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 2.0 1.0 58.9% 64.5% 48.8% 33.3% 25.0% 58.0% 30.4%
30 2006 6/8 0.2 1.2 69.5% 55.1% 44.9% 36.1% 40.3% 51.5% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22/577 1.4 2.5 63.8% 59.8% 47.9% 46.4% 47.7% 55.4% 44.4% — 71/194 1.6 2.3 64.4% 61.4% 47.8% 55.3% 46.1% 56.6% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chanda Rubin Laura Granville
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24 1998 1512 104.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.12
18 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24 1999 1501 95.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04
19 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38 2001 1486 117.9 — — — — +27 — — 14.3% -3.14 0–1 — — -0.28
21 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41 2002 1638 133.0 — — — — -22 — +41 47.8% +0.09 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 103.7 -0.79
22 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79 2003 1652 130.1 +0.38 +1.61 1.093 51.8% -4 -93 +67 51.9% +0.13 6–10 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.7 +0.59
23 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46 2004 1600 113.5 -0.02 -1.05 0.945 48.6% +45 -119 — 46.3% -0.39 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.5 +1.57
24 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47 2005 1613 122.6 +2.34 -2.15 0.993 50.2% -27 — +133 46.8% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.60
25 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54 2006 1589 119.7 +1.32 -1.98 1.003 50.3% +21 -140 +111 43.5% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 +0.28
26 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02 2007 1612 125.6 +0.15 -1.84 0.904 48.0% +10 -209 +140 44.1% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 -1.20
27 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62 2008 1593 108.1 -0.86 -1.03 0.587 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.41
28 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02 2009 1565 93.8 -0.31 -3.03 0.603 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.04
29 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30 2010 1542 100.5 -0.89 -3.05 0.723 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
30 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61 — 1699 128.3 +0.70 -1.52 0.940 48.8% +7 -125 +103 45.4% -0.33 24–28 (46%) 15–18 (45%) 97.7 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.